Messages In This Thread
RE: poly-fragmented vs. "traditional" DID - orek - 04-08-2015, 12:25 PM
poly-fragmented vs. "traditional" DID
Author Message
orek Offline
Senior Member
*****

Posts: 302
Threads: 12
Joined: Jun 2012
#31
RE: poly-fragmented vs. "traditional" DID
Hi, cew, welcome to MM. Smile

Yes, the number is, I believe, over a hundred parts (though that's obviously a random number picked for the sake of a generalized identification), and layering of parts is also a common factor in polyfragmented systems. I don't think there's an official diagnostic term or criteria for it, but there does seem to be awareness of it among those who study and treat DID--to a limited degree. I hope there's more understood about it in the future, even though it's just a variation of DID and technically treated the same. The nuances in presentation, etc., is better recognized and treated if understood.
04-08-2015, 12:25 PM
Find Reply


Messages In This Thread
RE: poly-fragmented vs. "traditional" DID - orek - 04-08-2015, 12:25 PM

Forum Jump: