poly-fragmented vs. "traditional" DID

[orek]

I've read her descriptions, too, People. Also good. Also, unfortunately (for me) Christian. But nevertheless relevant, I think. And the "not fully formed" makes sense. That'd be another way of having/thinking of fragments that aren't fully developed into full-blown personalities. That'd be the only plausible way so many could co-exist. And it's encouraging to read that those fragments tend to spontaneously merge or disappear after the emotion or issue they are holding is vented/addressed. That coincides with anything I could find on it, too. Thanks for the feedback.

Must add a P.S. I actually like what she writes in the Blooming Lotus blog. I don't recall where I saw that she's Christian, but in her blog she writes about self-love and acceptance for healing, not God's love or power, etc. She probably has personal spiritual aspects to her healing, but she keeps the blog about sound psychological healing practices as she experienced them in her journey. So kudos to her. At the end of any particular blog there are links for other related links within her blog that address aspects of poly-fragmentation and DID--layering, alters and names, etc. I relate and agree with much of her writing and descriptions. She does come from red dot background stuff but only mentions it in context where appropriate and without the over-blown hysteria and power so often given to it by others I've read in books or known as counselors.